Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it)
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:21:51
Message-Id: 1983964.TQhU476HiO@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it) by hasufell
1 On Sunday 14 September 2014 15:42:15 hasufell wrote:
2 > Patrick Lauer:
3 > >> Are we going to disallow merge commits and ask devs to rebase local
4 > >> changes in order to keep the history "clean"?
5 > >
6 > > Is that going to be sane with our commit frequency?
7 >
8 > You have to merge or rebase anyway in case of a push conflict, so the
9 > only difference is the method and the effect on the history.
10 >
11 > Currently... CVS allows you to run repoman on an outdated tree and push
12 > broken ebuilds with repoman being happy. Git will not allow this.
13
14 iow, git doesn't allow people to work on more than one item at a time?
15
16 That'd mean I need half a dozen checkouts just to emulate cvs, which somehow
17 doesn't make much sense to me ...

Replies