From: | Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it) | ||
Date: | Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:21:51 | ||
Message-Id: | 1983964.TQhU476HiO@localhost | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it) by hasufell |
1 | On Sunday 14 September 2014 15:42:15 hasufell wrote: |
2 | > Patrick Lauer: |
3 | > >> Are we going to disallow merge commits and ask devs to rebase local |
4 | > >> changes in order to keep the history "clean"? |
5 | > > |
6 | > > Is that going to be sane with our commit frequency? |
7 | > |
8 | > You have to merge or rebase anyway in case of a push conflict, so the |
9 | > only difference is the method and the effect on the history. |
10 | > |
11 | > Currently... CVS allows you to run repoman on an outdated tree and push |
12 | > broken ebuilds with repoman being happy. Git will not allow this. |
13 | |
14 | iow, git doesn't allow people to work on more than one item at a time? |
15 | |
16 | That'd mean I need half a dozen checkouts just to emulate cvs, which somehow |
17 | doesn't make much sense to me ... |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it) | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it) | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it) | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it) | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it) | Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it) | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |