Archives
Archives
| From: | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it) | ||
| Date: | Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:42:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | 5415B757.8090800@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it) by Patrick Lauer |
||
| 1 | Patrick Lauer: |
| 2 | >> Are we going to disallow merge commits and ask devs to rebase local |
| 3 | >> changes in order to keep the history "clean"? |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Is that going to be sane with our commit frequency? |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | You have to merge or rebase anyway in case of a push conflict, so the |
| 9 | only difference is the method and the effect on the history. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Currently... CVS allows you to run repoman on an outdated tree and push |
| 12 | broken ebuilds with repoman being happy. Git will not allow this. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it) | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it) | Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> |