1 |
On 06/19/2013 06:23 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
2 |
> I guess the follow-up question is this: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Are there any consumers of these libraries which require the 32-bit |
5 |
> (x86) ABI to be installed? |
6 |
No ... t jet. And not that likely to arise, but I'm out of crystal balls |
7 |
;-) . |
8 |
|
9 |
> I'm all for having fun, but I think the intent was to keep the |
10 |
> multilib-build eclass usage to a minimum. |
11 |
Sorry, I've missed that agreement, can you point me to it, please? |
12 |
|
13 |
> Otherwise, you'll end up installing libraries that will never be used. |
14 |
Same goes for all corner cases of emul-linux-members. |
15 |
|
16 |
Turning abi_x86_32 on/off in a global scale is a decision to be made by |
17 |
the user. With all consequences (initial compile time vs recompiles on |
18 |
reconsiderations). It doesn't make that difference if turned off. |
19 |
But if needed, it's just there. |
20 |
|
21 |
[Said that, I hope it doesn't propagate -abi_x86_32 down the dep tree.] |
22 |
|
23 |
[And I seriously doubt that any user has the patience to watch us |
24 |
migrate the tree on a per-request basis. Let's be honest then and |
25 |
abandon it. -- not my standpoint, under given circumstances of |
26 |
ready-to-use implementation.] |
27 |
|
28 |
Michael |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Michael Weber |
32 |
Gentoo Developer |
33 |
web: https://xmw.de/ |
34 |
mailto: Michael Weber <xmw@g.o> |