| 1 |
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Michael Weber <xmw@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 06/19/2013 06:23 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I'm all for having fun, but I think the intent was to keep the |
| 4 |
>> multilib-build eclass usage to a minimum. |
| 5 |
> Sorry, I've missed that agreement, can you point me to it, please? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Just something I picked up from various IRC conversations with mgorny |
| 9 |
and pals. More precisely, I should say it was the eclass author's |
| 10 |
intent, and it is a principle with which I personally agree. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Turning abi_x86_32 on/off in a global scale is a decision to be made by |
| 13 |
> the user. With all consequences (initial compile time vs recompiles on |
| 14 |
> reconsiderations). It doesn't make that difference if turned off. |
| 15 |
> But if needed, it's just there. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
It's a good point. As long as we are willing to support users who do |
| 19 |
not enable it globally, I guess it is fine. |
Archives