Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs))
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:40:21
Message-Id: ervjp1$d1t$1@sea.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) by Stephen Bennett
1 Stephen Bennett wrote:
2 > On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:51:51 +0000
3 > Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote:
4 >> The PMS will presumably be the definitive statement of what should
5 >> happen for *all* gentoo PMs, and it so happens that the people who
6 >> are doing it are mostly paludis devs, and sorry it won't be ready til
7 >> Paludis is. pfft.
8 >
9 > Noone said that. At present the only people working on it are also
10 > working on Paludis, but that can change should people take an interest.
11 > As for "it won't be ready til Paludis is", that's not what was stated
12 > -- what ciaranm said was that his personal priority will switch to
13 > getting PMS finished once paludis is ready. That doesn't mean that
14 > other people can't work on it and finish it before that, and I for one
15 > currently have PMS above Paludis on my priorities list and don't intend
16 > to wait for the latter.
17 >
18 Glad to hear it :D
19
20 Ciaran did say the spec was worthless without Paludis. Still as long as it's
21 coming..
22
23
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list