Archives
Archives
| From: | Ralph Sennhauser <sera@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fwd: Heads up for Qt5 | ||
| Date: | Sat, 28 Jul 2012 09:28:01 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20120728112703.17b12322@sera-17.lan | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fwd: Heads up for Qt5 by Ben de Groot |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:54:07 +0800 |
| 2 | Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > We do not have (nor want to support) a qt useflag. We have opted |
| 5 | > for "qt4" and "qt5" useflags as the most straightforward and least |
| 6 | > confusing. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Indeed, the flag qt has almost disappeared from the tree. Good to know. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Fwd: Heads up for Qt5 | Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> |