Archives
Archives
| From: | Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Fwd: Heads up for Qt5 | ||
| Date: | Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:08:40 | ||
| Message-Id: | jv0dkh$81r$1@dough.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fwd: Heads up for Qt5 by Ralph Sennhauser |
||
| 1 | On 28/07/12 12:27, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: |
| 2 | > On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:54:07 +0800 |
| 3 | > Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | >> We do not have (nor want to support) a qt useflag. We have opted |
| 6 | >> for "qt4" and "qt5" useflags as the most straightforward and least |
| 7 | >> confusing. |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > Indeed, the flag qt has almost disappeared from the tree. Good to know. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Why the different policies between the gtk and qt USE flags? This just |
| 12 | looks inconsistent. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Fwd: Heads up for Qt5 | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |