| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 07/17/2013 11:55 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> It is my understanding that if you directly use a function from an |
| 8 |
> eclass you are REQUIRED to inherit that eclass. Given that kind |
| 9 |
> of sanity would have prevented these failures I find it difficult |
| 10 |
> to believe my understanding is wrong, but I am willing to learn. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I think I'll start inheriting base.eclass so I can use multilib |
| 13 |
> functions. I mean, base.eclass inherits eutils.eclass which |
| 14 |
> inherits multilib.eclass so it should work out fine, right? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
You are wrong. What matters is the API of an eclass and how it is defined. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
There is no such definition of base.eclass guaranteeing that it will |
| 20 |
always either a) inherit eutils.eclass or b) provide certain functions |
| 21 |
from eutils.eclass (maybe by defining them directly in the future). |
| 22 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 23 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
| 24 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR5xd0AAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzaxQH/0HZgEuSFwxO9yAwktAFLlW4 |
| 27 |
FdvNaUS+bn1oYGi/0vr/7E/j17ZH5/0nych/kw7kOa6009BpBjzdmDeAeZhIGI3n |
| 28 |
tGGJtYNAsnZ16Rp7yrD0IZNj71ozSiLr6cBJs6m4rpOEJls9O0I1qazxnD+45o6W |
| 29 |
iPfiDpfcUPFmTa/P3PJ69lAlNQA3EymmKXfB5SJdbt3QELxQR6wGdnpfrev0ieiG |
| 30 |
gwpmzQzVjgt/PBpw4+tH/HFNdEXF+YjfbGGXoYNkO0FS+GppMtKaTYLEzbLPVORz |
| 31 |
1v1oBWw/Ysz7CYML1C5R+uZpbf8cZK26mrQMj5gOSeyem/o5vgD7R3uhHFAgsgs= |
| 32 |
=7JSh |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives