Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] force verbose build log as per PMS policy?
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 23:24:52
Message-Id: 501C5C61.6020001@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] force verbose build log as per PMS policy? by "Michał Górny"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 08/01/2012 06:07 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
5 > On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:13:43 +0200 hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
6 > wrote:
7 >
8 >> We already had a discussion about cmake-utils.eclass and forcing
9 >> verbose build log for that which was approved:
10 >> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce7d33748936663e84a5463fbf7f4d39.xml
11 >>
12 >>
13 >>
14 Also we have bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384193 and
15 >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379497
16 >>
17 >> I opened a tracker
18 >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429308
19 >>
20 >> Some devs seem unsure about that or want to have a council vote
21 >> on that https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429332
22 >
23 > PMS doesn't have such a thing as a 'policy'. Gentoo can have one,
24 > and I believe that should be discussed per Gentoo policy.
25 >
26
27 So that would simply mean we add that information to the devmanual?
28
29 Should I open a bug with a devmanual patch then?
30 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
31 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
32 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
33
34 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQHFxhAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzNbQIAK2YN5HiLwFuQ8Q1AuIGGBsK
35 1zEQlO3pb5wSXlfnP7oPMtBjvMaphV+bulwuUWJURE3LRatgSrNOOFsk31T0I5NJ
36 ShsZgzxA5L/ol74STDu1Oshu7dhCdnj9Xz2/6cUIAUuMirPRz+ac74NyclIrNj9T
37 CygYW+F0AFbPVrJAi7/IjuvtUKrpcnlCPSprycnJ0rS9D2ZSuMJ6nI3DLeTjGhra
38 YVWDuklODbUX8ay/lmPveINGpE/bMy0dbygrXr2j+gjl6Q2w7JgYF+muCZlPD8i3
39 9/wK51nzKGeK855G+5Su8FMmRJwb18RpAs1ztyeOagTStB6+8pi17RsDzg6zPW4=
40 =sOc/
41 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] force verbose build log as per PMS policy? "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>
Re: [gentoo-dev] force verbose build log as per PMS policy? Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o>