Archives
Archives
| From: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | hasufell@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] force verbose build log as per PMS policy? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:07:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20120801180721.29f1bd53@pomiocik.lan | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] force verbose build log as per PMS policy? by hasufell |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:13:43 +0200 |
| 2 | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > We already had a discussion about cmake-utils.eclass and forcing |
| 5 | > verbose build log for that which was approved: |
| 6 | > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce7d33748936663e84a5463fbf7f4d39.xml |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > Also we have bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384193 and |
| 9 | > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379497 |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > I opened a tracker https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429308 |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | > Some devs seem unsure about that or want to have a council vote on |
| 14 | > that https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429332 |
| 15 | |
| 16 | PMS doesn't have such a thing as a 'policy'. Gentoo can have one, |
| 17 | and I believe that should be discussed per Gentoo policy. |
| 18 | |
| 19 | -- |
| 20 | Best regards, |
| 21 | Michał Górny |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] force verbose build log as per PMS policy? | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |