| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Peter Volkov wrote: |
| 5 |
> В Сбт, 23/08/2008 в 13:39 -0700, Zac Medico пишет: |
| 6 |
>> Please consider a PROPERTIES=live value that, when set in an ebuild, |
| 7 |
>> will serve to indicate that the ebuild will use some form of "live" |
| 8 |
>> source code that may vary each time that the package is installed. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Does this (and previous similar threads) suggestion means that portage |
| 11 |
> will not support GLEP 54? Or how it'll be related with said glep? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
It seems like GLEP 54 is intended to fill a similar gap in the |
| 15 |
ebuild metadata. With PROPERTIES=live, it doesn't seem like GLEP 54 |
| 16 |
will be much use since it seems like you can achieve essentially the |
| 17 |
same results by using PROPERTIES=live together with the existing |
| 18 |
version suffixes such as _pre and _p (to control ordering). |
| 19 |
- -- |
| 20 |
Thanks, |
| 21 |
Zac |
| 22 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 23 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
iEYEARECAAYFAki8BVYACgkQ/ejvha5XGaO8FACfUxmb1cchCxyiaA8Www1cYahG |
| 26 |
wcMAn3H2vlh/SMQQFC1BLp9H+e+Nz3aj |
| 27 |
=FdPD |
| 28 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives