| 1 |
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 08:08:07 -0700 |
| 2 |
Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Does this (and previous similar threads) suggestion means that |
| 4 |
> > portage will not support GLEP 54? Or how it'll be related with said |
| 5 |
> > glep? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> It seems like GLEP 54 is intended to fill a similar gap in the |
| 8 |
> ebuild metadata. With PROPERTIES=live, it doesn't seem like GLEP 54 |
| 9 |
> will be much use since it seems like you can achieve essentially the |
| 10 |
> same results by using PROPERTIES=live together with the existing |
| 11 |
> version suffixes such as _pre and _p (to control ordering). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Er, no you can't. There is no way of using existing version components |
| 14 |
to get the correct ordering. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives