| 1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 08:14 +1300, Jerome Brown wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>How about another option? |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>6) Disallow -USE within groups, but allow -@GROUP |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
<snip> |
| 10 |
> Then again, I don't think that flags should be specified in more than |
| 11 |
> one group. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> If it doesn't fit into a group, then don't group it. If it fits into |
| 14 |
> multiple groups, then either pick one and stick with it, or don't group |
| 15 |
> it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I agree on this point, but wonder if it will be too restrictive to |
| 18 |
enforce. Also, with to proposal to allow users to create their own |
| 19 |
groups, they may want a unique combination of flags which they setup in |
| 20 |
their overlay, which would violate the only in one group idea. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
The other place that a flag may need to be in multiple groups could be |
| 23 |
where local use flags are concerned, and they are related differently. |
| 24 |
(I know this is an unlikely situation, but then we are Gentoo Users and |
| 25 |
want to push the environs of what is possible/reasonable :) ) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Jerome Brown |
| 29 |
Technology Architect |
| 30 |
Hub.Net |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
P: +64 3 961-5116 |
| 33 |
M: +64 29 453 7663 |
| 34 |
F: +64 3 961-5129 |
| 35 |
E: jerome@×××××××.nz |
| 36 |
W: http://www.hub.net.nz/ |
| 37 |
O: Level 4, 818 Colombo St, Christchurch, New Zealand |
| 38 |
S: PO Box 1879, Christchurch, New Zealand |
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives