1 |
Stuart Herbert posted <1131382994.8546.34.camel@××××××××××××××.org>, |
2 |
excerpted below, on Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:03:14 +0000: |
3 |
|
4 |
>> The announce list is one. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> By your own admission, you're on the announce list, and but you didn't |
7 |
> know about the Apache changes. Imagine how many other users were in the |
8 |
> same situation. Imagine how many other users never signed up to the |
9 |
> announce list in the first place. |
10 |
|
11 |
I guess I wasn't quite clear, then. Yes, I KNEW about the changes, from |
12 |
several sources. The first source I knew about them from was here, I |
13 |
believe, seeing the earlier discussion. Because of that, it was old news |
14 |
by the time I saw it on announce and I wasn't sure I'd seen it there |
15 |
because I'd lost track of all the locations and threads I'd seen it in by |
16 |
then. |
17 |
|
18 |
I wasn't sure it was on announce, not because I didn't see it there, but |
19 |
because it was old news by then. Actually, from my perspective, that's a |
20 |
/good/ thing, because one of the reasons I'm subscribed here is to get as |
21 |
early a heads-up on things as possible. The news SHOULD go to announce |
22 |
and it did (tho I hadn't been sure of it in that case), but by definition, |
23 |
before it gets announced, it will need discussed, and likely as not, at |
24 |
least mention of that discussion will be seen here, well ahead of it |
25 |
actually happening or appearing on announce or on the news thing. |
26 |
|
27 |
Then seeing it on announce would jog my memory, if necessary, and remind |
28 |
me of the decision made, as sometimes the discussion here remains up in |
29 |
the air and I don't know the decision until later. (That's normal, not a |
30 |
bad thing.) |
31 |
|
32 |
Then seeing it in emerge would be another warning (for me), just in case |
33 |
I'd slept thru things, and to jog my memory once more. For me, and for |
34 |
those that care, that's all it should be, another warning, thus I'd call |
35 |
it fairly low priority. However, it's still good to have, and for those |
36 |
that don't care enough to go looking elsewhere, it might be the first |
37 |
warning they get. I personally wouldn't want to operate that way, nor |
38 |
could I imagine doing so, but I realize the point made that obviously, |
39 |
others are missing all the warning signs and seeing it there might be the |
40 |
last warning that does some good. That's a GOOD thing! It's just not |
41 |
personally good enough that I'd prioritize it real heavily, but it's still |
42 |
a good thing to have, so I won't argue with OTHERS prioritizing it. =8^) |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
46 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
47 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
48 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |