| 1 |
On 29/09/2015 16:29, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 28/09/15 06:58 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Also, we are dropping the use of the -O switch for mount/umount |
| 4 |
>> -a. This is being dropped because it is util-linux specific and |
| 5 |
>> not compatible with busybox. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Does this have any actual end-user impact? AFAIK, using the -O |
| 8 |
> switch was 'just added' by us originally (i think to reduce the |
| 9 |
> explicit listing of the different fs types or otherwise simplify the |
| 10 |
> init script code) right? I'm just wondering if this paragraph is |
| 11 |
> actually necessary or not.. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
As a user, that para in the news makes me ask "how does this affect |
| 14 |
me?". I have to go read man pages and init scripts to find out. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Perhaps this: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Also, we are dropping the use of the -O switch for mount/umount -a, |
| 19 |
because it is util-linux specific and not compatible with busybox. This |
| 20 |
only affects mounts with "_netdev" listed under options in /etc/fstab. |
| 21 |
Such systems should use "noauto" and/or "nofail" as described above. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 25 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives