1 |
Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 11:59:23AM -0400, Brad Laue wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>A concern of mine about many Linux distributions is that in the long |
5 |
>>haul between binary releases of a distribution, the packages included |
6 |
>>with the release can become quite old. In Gentoo's case, if one GRP |
7 |
>>installed their system nine months from now and emerge -u'd, they would |
8 |
>>be faced with a considerable number of packages to update (I wouldn't be |
9 |
>>surprised if it was all of them). |
10 |
> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I'm going to be labeled as "not-user-friendly-bastard" on this one, but if |
13 |
> you have a user that GRP installs Gentoo, and then wants to GRP-update with |
14 |
> every release (and keeping in mind that drobbins want to increase the |
15 |
> release-frequency), I'd have to say that he should take a look at the binary |
16 |
> distributions. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Which brings the topic to: |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
>>Realising that Gentoo is of course a source-based distribution, quickly |
22 |
>>and easily installing the latest and greatest by using emerge -k, then |
23 |
>>optimizing by rebuilding incrementally has surely sparked a great deal |
24 |
>>of additional interest in the distribution. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
> This is something that all distributions deliver: binary packages and an |
28 |
> "easy" way to source-compile packages but keep them in the database. If |
29 |
> Gentoo would go the same way, we are neglecting the source-based stuff. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> We should not focus on GRP-after-installation. As I see it, GRP isn't even |
32 |
> the main installation method, but an option. If I am mistaken on this |
33 |
> subject, please say so, because I am writing everything with this in mind (I |
34 |
> am thinking of our handbook-to-come). |
35 |
|
36 |
I completely agree with you on this one. GRP is nothing but a way to |
37 |
quickly get your system up and running so that you can use your system |
38 |
while you are re-compiling everything with your optimizations and USE flags. |
39 |
|
40 |
If Gentoo is going to have binary packages available for *updates* then |
41 |
we might as well just get rid of portage and switch to RPM packages |
42 |
while we're at it :) |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
Andrew Gaffney |
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |