Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: Gentoo Developers <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage in Embedded Systems?
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 13:27:04
Message-Id: 20041005132702.GA9399@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Portage in Embedded Systems? by Chris White
1 On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:33:23PM +0900, Chris White wrote:
2 > Maybe I've just not seen this, but what sort of footprint does
3 > portage leave on embedded systems with low cpu/ram? I ask this mainly
4 > because it's a Good Thing To Know (tm) considering the last LWE
5 > conference was full of people asking about using Gentoo for embedded
6 > devices. Something like higher end Palms may be able to dish it out,
7 > but what happens when you get to lower end palms or even cell phones?
8 > Thanks ahead of time for any/all comments and hold on (*ChrisWhite
9 > prepares fireproof suit)... and flames.
10 I believe the best approach is to extend catalyst into building
11 stripped-down images, while still maintaining a separate development
12 environment.
13
14 Eg:
15 While GCC/Portage/Python/Binutils etc. are needed to build packages, I
16 don't need them on my cellphone.
17
18 However, I'm not really with the embedded group, just hacking on some
19 embedded MIPS hardware (MyCable XXS1500) myself for the moment (until I
20 get a lot more time).
21
22 Back to paper writing now, 6.32am and nearly finished...
23
24 --
25 Robin Hugh Johnson
26 E-Mail : robbat2@××××××××××××××.net
27 Home Page : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2
28 ICQ# : 30269588 or 41961639
29 GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage in Embedded Systems? Nicholas Jones <carpaski@g.o>