1 |
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:33:23PM +0900, Chris White wrote: |
2 |
> Maybe I've just not seen this, but what sort of footprint does |
3 |
> portage leave on embedded systems with low cpu/ram? I ask this mainly |
4 |
> because it's a Good Thing To Know (tm) considering the last LWE |
5 |
> conference was full of people asking about using Gentoo for embedded |
6 |
> devices. Something like higher end Palms may be able to dish it out, |
7 |
> but what happens when you get to lower end palms or even cell phones? |
8 |
> Thanks ahead of time for any/all comments and hold on (*ChrisWhite |
9 |
> prepares fireproof suit)... and flames. |
10 |
I believe the best approach is to extend catalyst into building |
11 |
stripped-down images, while still maintaining a separate development |
12 |
environment. |
13 |
|
14 |
Eg: |
15 |
While GCC/Portage/Python/Binutils etc. are needed to build packages, I |
16 |
don't need them on my cellphone. |
17 |
|
18 |
However, I'm not really with the embedded group, just hacking on some |
19 |
embedded MIPS hardware (MyCable XXS1500) myself for the moment (until I |
20 |
get a lot more time). |
21 |
|
22 |
Back to paper writing now, 6.32am and nearly finished... |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
26 |
E-Mail : robbat2@××××××××××××××.net |
27 |
Home Page : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2 |
28 |
ICQ# : 30269588 or 41961639 |
29 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |