1 |
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:57 AM, David Seifert <soap@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 08:55 +0100, Lars Wendler wrote: |
3 |
>> On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:48:56 +0300 Eray Aslan wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:20:56PM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
5 |
>>>> |
6 |
>>>> * Posting to the list will only be possible to Gentoo developers |
7 |
>>>> and whitelisted additional participants. |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> This is so contrary to what I and I thought Gentoo stands for: |
10 |
>>> openness, transparency, inclusiveness even when these require a |
11 |
>>> rather thick skin and result in high noise. It's a price worth |
12 |
>>> paying. |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>> I guess I should a) pay more attention to council elections b) |
15 |
>>> consider the idea that the whole council thing as it stands now is |
16 |
>>> just not working. |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> Wow. I couldn't have said it better. Seems we're turning into an |
19 |
>> elitist club or something... I wonder how many users we're going to |
20 |
>> loose on this one. Well done council :-( |
21 |
> |
22 |
> If your only reason to use Gentoo is because you can post to the main |
23 |
> developer ML, and not because we try to provide a great distribution |
24 |
> with lots of choice, a current toolchain and lots of customization, |
25 |
> then you're likely using the wrong distribution. |
26 |
|
27 |
It's a question of perception. Some users might come to feel that the |
28 |
Gentoo developers are not interested in their input, unlike the |
29 |
developers of all other distributions (that I know of). |
30 |
|
31 |
Gentoo's singling itself itself out as less receptive to its users |
32 |
simply because some its developers are too Trumpian to resist arguing |
33 |
with people who criticize their work or Gentoo. |