1 |
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:58:47AM +0200, Dominik Westner wrote: |
2 |
> Interesting I always thought that you can boot a system without /usr. |
3 |
> Anything which is necessary for system startup is located in /bin, |
4 |
> /sbin, /lib ... |
5 |
|
6 |
/bin, /sbin, /lib etc... are the files necessary to boot the system and to be |
7 |
able to mount /usr (seperate partition or even NFS-exported). |
8 |
|
9 |
/usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /usr/lib, /use/share etc... are the rest of the files, |
10 |
provided by the distribution. This can be NFS-exported as happens frequently |
11 |
on large networks where the boxes are merely intended for command-line usage |
12 |
(but also "bigger" usage is possible, ofcourse). |
13 |
|
14 |
/usr/local consist of the files that are compiled *on that box*, not by using |
15 |
any distribution-provided packagingtool (that's why all the tarballs you'll |
16 |
find install themselves in /usr/local by default). |
17 |
|
18 |
/opt is, as mentioned by another poster (sry, I've forgotten your name), most |
19 |
of the time used for binary installs, such as the LSB-rpms. |
20 |
|
21 |
This is how I've learned about the dir-structure. I think this is also the |
22 |
way that FHS defines everything (in general). |
23 |
|
24 |
I know there aren't tools in /usr that should be in /bin etc... since my /usr |
25 |
is a seperate partition and works great, so I don't think there is a problem. |
26 |
|
27 |
Has anyone succesfully used Gentoo in a network and with /usr NFS-exported? |
28 |
|
29 |
Wkr, |
30 |
Sven Vermeulen |