Archives
Archives
| From: | Dominik Westner <westner@×××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Marko Mikulicic <marko@××××.org> | ||
| Cc: | Eric Jacoboni <jaco@××××××××××××.org>, gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage and /usr/local | ||
| Date: | Thu, 05 Sep 2002 01:58:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | ED03D22A-C09C-11D6-9EE9-000393823B30@logicunited.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage and /usr/local by Marko Mikulicic |
||
| 1 | On Donnerstag, September 5, 2002, at 02:08 AM, Marko Mikulicic wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > Why UNIX has the distinction between /,/usr ? |
| 4 | > I readed in the GNU Hurd documentation that it is just |
| 5 | > a tradition from the old tape times, althrough it is true that |
| 6 | > this separation eases the network sharing of binaries (/usr can be |
| 7 | > mounted readonly |
| 8 | > in remote clients). |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Interesting I always thought that you can boot a system without /usr. |
| 12 | Anything which is necessary for system startup is located in /bin, |
| 13 | /sbin, /lib ... |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Dominik |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage and /usr/local | Marko Mikulicic <marko@××××.org> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage and /usr/local | Sven Vermeulen <sven.vermeulen@××××××.be> |