1 |
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 20:38 -0800, Nathan Smith wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 12:41:00 +0000 |
3 |
> Roy Marples <roy@×××××××.name> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > Hi List |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > 2008 is here and it's time for some change! |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > OpenRC is now ready for testing. There are no ebuilds in the tree, but |
10 |
> > some are available here [1] that offers a baselayout-2 shell that |
11 |
> > pulls in openrc-9999. I'll just offer a git ebuild for the time |
12 |
> > being, so bugs can be fixed fast without having to bump all the time. |
13 |
> > But it should be fairly smooth going. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I am wondering about the blocker on baselayout < 2.0 in your git |
16 |
> overlay ebuild for baselayout-2. Is there some reason that the upgrade |
17 |
> path from baselayout-1 to -2 will not work for openrc? |
18 |
|
19 |
File ownership of a few things changed from baselayout -> openrc. Enough |
20 |
so that openrc is a self enclosed product, but relies on system files |
21 |
that baselayout supplies. |
22 |
|
23 |
A blocker is the only way I know of doing this so portage doesn't |
24 |
complain about overwriting files owned by another package. |
25 |
|
26 |
Thanks |
27 |
|
28 |
Roy |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |