| 1 |
On Thursday 22 July 2004 13:55, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 2 |
> Assuming baselayout has all the arches that folks are currently working on, |
| 3 |
> that gives us a list of: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> x86 ppc sparc mips alpha arm hppa amd64 ia64 ppc64 s390 |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Isn't that list missing the bsd and the macos arches? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> What is the problem we're trying to solve here? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
a) There doesn't seem to be a definitive list of ARCH's to assign bugs to |
| 12 |
(and the list changes anyway). I don't like guesswork. |
| 13 |
b) Adding a cc per arch per bug is time consuming and error-prone. |
| 14 |
c) There doesn't seem to be a definitive way to file bugs for ARCH's and |
| 15 |
marking packages as stable |
| 16 |
d) Assigning bugs to 'arch-maintainers@g.o' will result in too much email |
| 17 |
for the people who read it |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Best regards, |
| 20 |
Stu |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o |
| 23 |
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 24 |
http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu |
| 27 |
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C |
| 28 |
-- |
Archives