Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: k_f@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] bzr.eclass: Add --overwrite-tags option to pull command.
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 14:37:05
Message-Id: 23161.48517.148291.638434@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] bzr.eclass: Add --overwrite-tags option to pull command. by Kristian Fiskerstrand
1 >>>>> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
2
3 >> Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/446422
4
5 > Bug or Closes, Fixes would be referencing a commit-id c.f GLEP 66.
6
7 Updated, thanks for catching this.
8
9 > More generally though, should we start requiring more verbose commit
10 > messages for eclasses to make it easier to trace changes in our git
11 > repo directly without reaching out to bugs? At least including
12 > summaries of the respective bugs as a short description?
13
14 In the concrete example, the bug's summary is "bzr.eclass might need
15 to use bzr pull's --overwrite-tags flag" which is not much different
16 from the git commit message.
17
18 Ulrich

Replies