Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>, "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider | ||
| Date: | Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:25:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_=32_2H9Lm6q7hWgAiomyhTHzefuvp7pMxUOyDgq2tB5g@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider by Richard Yao |
||
| 1 | On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > If userbase is what matters to you, then OpenRC+eudev won. It is the |
| 4 | > logical choice for those concerned about userbase because that is what |
| 5 | > the Linux ecosystem will be using going forward. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Uh, if we cared solely about userbase we'd be using upstart. I'm |
| 9 | pretty sure that there are more chromebooks out there than Docker |
| 10 | containers running Alpine linux. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Do people actually use docker images created by docker? That seems a |
| 13 | bit like asking the Apache Foundation to build you a website. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | Rich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider | Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> |