| 1 |
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:39:08 -0700 |
| 2 |
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Here's the proposal again. If there's an issue with it, shoot it |
| 5 |
> down, but from here, it certainly seems to fit the bill. Again, |
| 6 |
> I'd /love/ to say I was the one that came up with it, but I wasn't. |
| 7 |
> =8^) |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> * give [AH]Ts a <name>.tester@g.o address. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> - It's not a subdomain, so the existing infrastructure should have no |
| 12 |
> problems with it. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> - testername.tester@g.o remains distinctive enough it should |
| 15 |
> alleviate any doubts or confusion over status. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> - the biggest possible objection I can see is that the root, |
| 18 |
> tester@g.o, is already in use. Thus, in particular, I'd like |
| 19 |
> to see his reaction to this proposal. We could, of course, take the |
| 20 |
> same idea and change the root, if necessary. My previous suggestion, |
| 21 |
> intern, would work, or assistant, or something else. Tester is of |
| 22 |
> course short and concise, but intern or assistant would be more |
| 23 |
> generic, allowing the possiblity of other non-tester additions, in |
| 24 |
> the future, with the same root. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Has the same problem as a subdomain as it creates two "classes" of |
| 27 |
devs. So it would solve the potential technical problems, but we still |
| 28 |
have the semantic issues. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Marius |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 36 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives