| 1 |
29.8.2005, 17:59:07, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I honestly don't think it would be a good idea to forget the lessons of the |
| 4 |
> past and start bloating the profiles with tons of "desktop" and "server" |
| 5 |
> profiles, among anything else people would want. After all, as soon as we did |
| 6 |
> a "desktop" profile, then we would have requests for "gnome" and "kde" |
| 7 |
> sub-profiles. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Uhm, we don't need desktop profile, the current profiles are desktop ones - a |
| 10 |
pretty bloated desktop, but whatever... I'd really welcome server profile |
| 11 |
though, basically w/ the set of USE flags that hardened profile provides, but |
| 12 |
without hardened features. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Best regards, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Jakub Moc |
| 19 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 20 |
GPG signature: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 21 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives