| 1 |
Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> posted |
| 2 |
1174051411.8633.42.camel@××××××××××××××××.org, excerpted below, on Fri, |
| 3 |
16 Mar 2007 09:23:31 -0400: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 04:35 +0000, Duncan wrote: |
| 6 |
>> * "If you perceive a breach of the Code of Conduct guidelines, let the |
| 7 |
>> proctors know." How? [N]o general proctor address is listed. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> We had no such alias made, but I'm requesting it to be done. I'll |
| 10 |
> update the document accordingly once we have the alias. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I also plan on making it known that users/developers should be able to |
| 13 |
> also contact any of the local moderation/operation staff for the medium |
| 14 |
> they're on, meaning they can contact any op in #gentoo or any moderator |
| 15 |
> in the forums. There's no need to necessarily go directly to the |
| 16 |
> proctors for everything. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Cool. =8^) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
>> their council term, if elected). Was that really intended? Perhaps it |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Yes, it was intended. Nobody on the Council should be a proctor. I |
| 23 |
> think you missed that only the *initial* group of proctors includes all |
| 24 |
> global moderators. By the next council meeting, we plan on having a |
| 25 |
> much reduced list of proctors to serve in a more permanent role. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
OK. Makes sense now. I saw the /initial/ but wasn't sure where it was |
| 28 |
going from there. The further explanation makes sense. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Thanks. =8^) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 34 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 35 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives