Archives
Archives
| From: | Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: using Ninja in more CMake-based packages | ||
| Date: | Mon, 08 Jun 2015 13:35:34 | ||
| Message-Id: | ml45m7$i9s$1@ger.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using Ninja in more CMake-based packages by Franz Fellner |
||
| 1 | Franz Fellner <alpine.art.de@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > IMHO a working build system |
| 4 | > always is better than a fast but potentially broken one :) |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Meanwhile, it is not so clear which of the two systems |
| 7 | is more likely the "potentially broken" one: |
| 8 | According to some of the mentioned bugs, it appears to me |
| 9 | that some upstreams consider rather ninja as the "working" |
| 10 | (and well-tested) tool, and Makefile as poor man's fallback. |