| 1 |
On 08/09/2012 09:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:42:15 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Repeat after me: having your first process require anything more than |
| 6 |
>> libc is stupid and dangerous. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> But you are aware that glibc is probably much, much worse than most of |
| 9 |
> those 'stupid and dangerous' libraries, right? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Then we have a bigger problem, since everything in our system is based |
| 12 |
on that. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
>> Once that concept gets accepted then we could discuss about why |
| 15 |
>> reinventing shellscript may not be that sound and other less glaring, |
| 16 |
>> horrid and appalling design choices. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Yes, exactly. So why does openrc reinvent that horrible shellscript? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
It is not re-invented, in fact we can use any compatible shell. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
lu |
Archives