| 1 |
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:42:15 +0200 |
| 2 |
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Repeat after me: having your first process require anything more than |
| 5 |
> libc is stupid and dangerous. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
But you are aware that glibc is probably much, much worse than most of |
| 8 |
those 'stupid and dangerous' libraries, right? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> Once that concept gets accepted then we could discuss about why |
| 11 |
> reinventing shellscript may not be that sound and other less glaring, |
| 12 |
> horrid and appalling design choices. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Yes, exactly. So why does openrc reinvent that horrible shellscript? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Best regards, |
| 18 |
Michał Górny |
Archives