Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Marineau <marineam@×××××××××.edu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Revisiting GLEP 19
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 00:27:44
Message-Id: 40FDB868.8070404@engr.orst.edu
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Revisiting GLEP 19 by Kurt Lieber
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Kurt Lieber wrote:
5 | A while back, I wrote GLEP 19[1] based on some of the needs of the
6 | gentoo-server project. For various reasons, the GLEP was tabled at the
7 | time and never went anywhere. A number of folks have expressed an interest
8 | in revitalizing this GLEP, so I'd like to start a new discussion about
9 | implementing it. There was a couple of previous threads on this GLEP back
10 | when it was first introduced that I'll include[2] for your reference.
11 |
12 | So, with that said, thoughts, comments and other ideas are welcome.
13 |
14 | --kurt
15 |
16 | [1] http://glep.gentoo.org/glep-0019.html
17 | [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/15511
18 | http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/15584 (round 2)
19
20 ~From the looks of the thread so far people seem to be leaning toward
21 implimenting this system via profiles rather than the suggested new keyword
22 system in the GLEP. I think there are a couple issues with that solution,
23 maybe someone can clarify this for me.
24
25 1. Users dealing with profiles would need to be able to be easily change, and
26 review the possible profiles via a nice interface so that when that quartly
27 switch comes, it isn't to hard to understand what is going on.
28 2. This will require a bit of a paradigm shift in users. At the moment it seems
29 ~ (in the eyes of a normal user) like profiles are something in the background
30 of the system, but no one other than gentoo devs need know what they are or how
31 to use them. This is just my impression.
32 3. If a profile defines a specific set of packages that should not be upgraded
33 how are the possible security upgrades handled? If the profile defines package
34 versions then the profile would need to be modified. From my understanding a
35 stable profile normally should not be modified, but maybe this will change?
36
37 - --
38 Michael Marineau
39 marineam@×××××××××.edu
40 Oregon State University
41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
42 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
43
44 iD8DBQFA/bhoiP+LossGzjARAm3OAJ9kRitfKjHTd7pULZDa8vXzQFGBXQCfcA2H
45 5WS/WvTVKo8G0F9IFj+YU0s=
46 =JW6Z
47 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
48
49 --
50 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Revisiting GLEP 19 Dylan Carlson <absinthe@g.o>