| 1 |
On Sunday 27 April 2008, Santiago M. Mola wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:57 AM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Santiago M. Mola kirjoitti: |
| 4 |
> > > Thoughts? Isn't there anyone else willing to keep Nazi symbols outside |
| 5 |
> > > forums? If yes, at the expense of punting all politics or just as a |
| 6 |
> > > special case? |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Again this is the wrong mailing list. I don't see this thread having any |
| 9 |
> > technical content. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Actually I thought about it, but it seems @-project has no attention |
| 12 |
> from developers, and what I want to know if is more developers see |
| 13 |
> this as a problem, or not, or just don't care (if the later is the |
| 14 |
> case, the thread will just die shortly). |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Anyway, next time I'll use @-project, and let's see if someone |
| 17 |
> actually cares about that mailing list. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
unfortunately (fortunately?), that's the way the Gentoo community wants it. |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev is for development only. any non-development stuff goes to the |
| 21 |
gentoo-project list. you're most likely right there are a lot less people |
| 22 |
subscribed there, but that is because the people who arent subscribed there |
| 23 |
dont care about non-development issues. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
even if there may be a set of people not on the -project list but on the -dev |
| 26 |
list, and they have an opinion on this particular topic, putting the thread |
| 27 |
here is not appropriate. if they truly care, they can signup, fetch the |
| 28 |
relevant mails from the archive, and respond. |
| 29 |
-mike |
Archives