| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> | The reason behind this is that at approximately two thirds of bugs |
| 8 |
> received |
| 9 |
> | are feature requests and they are drowning at the real bugs. More |
| 10 |
> importantly, |
| 11 |
> | the critical bugs are becoming very hard to keep track of. This, at a |
| 12 |
> time |
| 13 |
> | when we are focusing on fixing major and critical bugs only so as to |
| 14 |
> get the |
| 15 |
> | next version completed quicker. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Are you having a tough time filtering out enhancements in your queries |
| 18 |
> or something? I don't understand how feature requests could possibly |
| 19 |
> interfere with anything besides other enhancements. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Many of the enhancements aren't marked as such, dev-portage has a lot of |
| 23 |
bugs ( I've been watching it for 4 months ) and they are varied, old and |
| 24 |
extremely difficult to manage at present. As long as the bugs are |
| 25 |
still in bugzilla I din't see a problem with them being closed. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> Thanks, |
| 28 |
> Donnie |
| 29 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> iD8DBQFC6QZgXVaO67S1rtsRAqkKAJ4+/fQUkkYaUOXVmYGobLTRh+tHeACcDnHU |
| 33 |
> ZsYj4ABIrHcnoYHzLPOWmu4= |
| 34 |
> =36q7 |
| 35 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives