Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Hold on portage feature requests
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:25:15
Message-Id: 42E90660.4010001@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Hold on portage feature requests by Jason Stubbs
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Jason Stubbs wrote:
5
6 | The reason behind this is that at approximately two thirds of bugs
7 received
8 | are feature requests and they are drowning at the real bugs. More
9 importantly,
10 | the critical bugs are becoming very hard to keep track of. This, at a time
11 | when we are focusing on fixing major and critical bugs only so as to
12 get the
13 | next version completed quicker.
14
15 Are you having a tough time filtering out enhancements in your queries
16 or something? I don't understand how feature requests could possibly
17 interfere with anything besides other enhancements.
18
19 Thanks,
20 Donnie
21 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
22 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
23
24 iD8DBQFC6QZgXVaO67S1rtsRAqkKAJ4+/fQUkkYaUOXVmYGobLTRh+tHeACcDnHU
25 ZsYj4ABIrHcnoYHzLPOWmu4=
26 =36q7
27 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
28 --
29 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Hold on portage feature requests Alec Joseph Warner <warnera6@×××××××.edu>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Hold on portage feature requests "Brian D. Harring" <ferringb@g.o>