1 |
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 15:09 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote: |
2 |
> You're suggesting jakub maybe shouldn't even be a Gentoo dev because he |
3 |
> *doesn't* give one unofficial overlay special treatment over another? |
4 |
|
5 |
The jave "unofficial" overlay is well on its way to becoming an official |
6 |
and officially hosted overlay. |
7 |
|
8 |
> > This childishness from *all* sides is getting really old, really fast. |
9 |
> > People need to grow the hell up, and quit with the melodrama. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Don't you think you yourself are overreacting a bit in your message? |
12 |
|
13 |
Not at all. I've been back on the gentoo-dev list for three weeks, and |
14 |
the actual "dev" part of it has been pretty much missing. This list |
15 |
would be more ideal as gentoo-rant, |
16 |
gentoo-torture-every-reader-with-endless-threads, |
17 |
gentoo-lets-not-get-along, gentoo-babies, gentoo-childishness, we can |
18 |
come with a few more. |
19 |
|
20 |
My personal view is apparently starting to be more public here, so I'll |
21 |
be plain: I think developers needs to all seriously reconsider what they |
22 |
are doing with Gentoo and why. I'm not advocating anything other than a |
23 |
bit of introspection on why people do this to begin with. |
24 |
|
25 |
In the past few weeks, I've seen devs get at each others' throats; and |
26 |
worse still at users' throats. And really, it's a little too much |
27 |
already. |
28 |
|
29 |
Thanks, |
30 |
|
31 |
Seemant |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |