1 |
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 21:52 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:44:23 +0100 |
3 |
> Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > For that reason alone, it should normally be avoided in international |
5 |
> > forums such as are provided by Gentoo. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Why yes! Gentoo needs to be one hundred percent serious and entirely |
8 |
> not fun. Anyone saying anything remotely amusing needs to be shut down |
9 |
> by the proctors immediately. Please keep up the good work. |
10 |
|
11 |
I really have to agree with you. The proctors have completely lost |
12 |
their way. They are ineffective. They tend to compound the problems |
13 |
they were created to stop. They are slow. They have not prevented |
14 |
anything, which was the reason for their creation. Rather, what they |
15 |
*have* done is stifle conversation, piss off people, get in the way of |
16 |
Developer Relations reports, and otherwise making developers feel like |
17 |
they don't want to participate in our official discussion channels. |
18 |
|
19 |
What do I think needs to be done? |
20 |
|
21 |
The proctors project needs to go away. It simply wasn't implemented in |
22 |
the way the Council had hoped and has proven to be more harmful than the |
23 |
original problems to morale and inter-developer trust. While the |
24 |
individual members might be doing what they think is best and trying |
25 |
their best, they've failed at the goals of improving our communications |
26 |
channels. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Chris Gianelloni |
30 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
31 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
32 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
33 |
Gentoo Foundation |