Re: [gentoo-dev] is gnome2.2 in stable or not?

[foser]

Alan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:21:51AM +0100, foser wrote:
>
>>gnome 2.2 is stable and marked as such for x86, as announced on the
>>mainpage. And the gnome meta package has been marked stable as last
>>package after all of it's deps, so i dunno what's going on your side but
>>it's no good. Either you getting your tree from a faulty rsync or you
>>might see problems like in bug #15436 due to a GRP install (something
>>which should be looked into).
>
>
> I'm thinking that something might be messed up with my setup here.
>
>
> phoenix alan # emerge world -up
>
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>
> Calculating world dependencies \
> !!! all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=media-libs/gst-plugins-0.6.0-r1"
> have been masked.
> !!!    (dependency required by "gnome-base/gnome-2.2-r1" [ebuild])
>
> Ok, so gst-plugins is masked, what version do I have:
>
> phoenix alan # emerge -s gst-plugins
> Searching...
> [ Results for search key : gst-plugins ]
> [ Applications found : 1 ]
>
> *  media-libs/gst-plugins
>    Latest version available: 0.5.2
>    Latest version installed: 0.4.2-r2
> 	[...]
>
> phoenix alan # grep KEYWORDS /usr/portage/media-libs/gst-plugins/gst-plugins-0.6.0-r1.ebuild
> KEYWORDS="x86 ~sparc ~ppc"
> phoenix alan # grep gst-plugins /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask
> phoenix alan #
>
> I don't have ACCEPT_KEYWORDS set to anything, so I'm wondering why a
> stable gst-plugins (and others as I'm looking through various ebuilds)
> isn't being caught by portage.
>
> Is there a recommended way of fixing this, rebuilding my portage cache
> other than an emerge sync (just did one, no change).
>

see the bugreport i mentioned


--
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list