1 |
Personally, I believe his plan is to blackmail all distros into compliance. |
2 |
If you DON'T change your name, he will post on your mailing list. This will, |
3 |
in effect, clog it with endless messages arguing this silly point back and |
4 |
forth until no work can actually get accomplished. |
5 |
|
6 |
It's a fiendishly simple plan. You've got to admire the man. (No really, |
7 |
it's in the GPL, you've GOT to admire the man.) |
8 |
|
9 |
=C= |
10 |
|
11 |
p.s. for the record, I do admire the contributions that Mr. Stallman has |
12 |
made to the *nix community. |
13 |
* |
14 |
* Cal Evans |
15 |
* The Virtual CIO |
16 |
* http://www.calevans.com |
17 |
* |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
-----Original Message----- |
21 |
From: gentoo-dev-admin@g.o [mailto:gentoo-dev-admin@g.o]On |
22 |
Behalf Of Kevyn Shortell |
23 |
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 6:37 AM |
24 |
To: Thomas M. Beaudry; Moritz Schulte |
25 |
Cc: Greg Corcoran; gentoo-dev@g.o |
26 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] License criteria for Gentoo |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
I don't personally think GNU/Linux is correct. I think that's a |
30 |
bastardization |
31 |
of the name, and it's doing a disservice to everything GNU stood for. |
32 |
It takes away from the efforts of those who've worked there, and |
33 |
focuses everything on RMS's attempt to get recognition for GNU. |
34 |
Note that he doesn't want you to change the name to Linux/GNU. He |
35 |
wants top billing for GNU, he wants GNU/Linux, So why is GNU |
36 |
more important than Linux? |
37 |
<...SNIP...> |