1 |
On Friday 03 December 2004 22:14, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 21:25 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
3 |
> > On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 16:12:40 -0500 Chris Gianelloni |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> > | On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 19:31 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
7 |
> > | > AFAICS there's no way to tell whether a profile is "inherit only" or |
8 |
> > | > whether it's complete enough to be used by an end user. Would it |
9 |
> > | > make sense to have an empty text file called "inherit-only" (for |
10 |
> > | > example) within profiles which aren't usable? |
11 |
> > | |
12 |
> > | I was always under the impression that all profiles should be usable. |
13 |
> > | If that is not the case, then I 100% agree that there should be some |
14 |
> > | way of marking a profile as unusable. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > Well, you couldn't really sanely run a system with your profile symlink |
17 |
> > pointing to 'base' or 'default-linux'. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> ...and like every time you assume something, somebody has to come out |
20 |
> and point out the fact that you're an ass. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Yeah, I hadn't considered default-linux or base. Though, to be honest, |
23 |
> I bet you would have a working system with either of them, or at leats |
24 |
> you should, even if it did keep from having arch or release-specific |
25 |
> changes. After all, most of it would be the changes in virtuals, which |
26 |
> so long as you emerged the right programs to satisfy the virtuals for |
27 |
> your arch, you should be fine with either of these. However, you are |
28 |
> definitely correct that you can no select one of these profiles, do an |
29 |
> "emerge system" and expect it to work without some intervention. |
30 |
|
31 |
# ln -sf /usr/portage/profiles/base /etc/make.profile |
32 |
# emerge -p system |
33 |
|
34 |
These are the packages that I would merge, in order: |
35 |
|
36 |
!!! ARCH is not set... Are you missing the /etc/make.profile symlink? |
37 |
!!! Is the symlink correct? Is your portage tree complete? |
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
Regards, |
41 |
Jason Stubbs |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |