1 |
Robert Moss wrote: |
2 |
> As far as I can tell, the SSE2 bugs have only hit 3.4.2, which is now |
3 |
> masked. 3.4.1 appears to be fine, and indeed less broken for SSE2 than |
4 |
> 3.3.x. The CXX bugs will only come out of the woodwork with testing, so |
5 |
> some testing (~x86) would be nice. |
6 |
|
7 |
*cough*bullshit*cough* |
8 |
|
9 |
most of the sse2 bugs have been there since 3.4.0 and the release |
10 |
manager even commented on them not being fixed (after once again |
11 |
targeting them for the next release). Scott Ladd is going to be working |
12 |
on them, so hopefully we'll see some fixes: |
13 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-09/msg00936.html |
14 |
|
15 |
The CXX bugs you're referring to only happen for nptl users, who have a |
16 |
broken pthread.h which isnt parsable by g++ in any way. this is fixed in |
17 |
the latest glibc snapshot, but that snapshot has a ton of issues of it's |
18 |
own... like -requiring- 2.6 kernel headers, semi-broken libresolv, etc. |
19 |
I'll break out a patch and apply it to older snapshots, but the result |
20 |
of that snapshot was so discouraging I havent really wanted to touch glibc. |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
> 3.5 is now 4.0, and as far as I know I'm the only person doing serious |
24 |
> testing (testsuites included). From what I've seen so far, it's fairly |
25 |
> rock-solid for where it is at the moment (early stage3), certainly more |
26 |
> so than 3.4 was; there are still internal compiler errors on important |
27 |
> stuff like glibc but these invariably get fixed in the last week-long |
28 |
> "big push" where they desperately call for testers in a mad rush to get |
29 |
> the thing released! That said, there's no way gcc-4 will be in ~x86 for |
30 |
> 2004.3, almost no way (unless it surprises me) it'll be in ~x86 for |
31 |
> 2004.0, but may be in most ~arches for 2004.1, assuming the slightly |
32 |
> stronger code strictness doesn't cause to many nasty bugs and assuming |
33 |
> we can iron out all the ICEs. |
34 |
|
35 |
O_O |
36 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-09/msg00771.html |
37 |
look at those testsuite results for amd64 for today... |
38 |
|
39 |
though, at the rate things are going, we might have 4.0 stable before 3.4. |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
Travis Tilley <lv@g.o> |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |