1 |
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 18:21 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote: |
2 |
> Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
3 |
> > In last weeks council meeting [1] it was decided that the Sunrise project is |
4 |
> > no longer suspended. I can give a short overview of the current status of |
5 |
> > the overlay: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > - we currently have 154 ebuilds in 58 categories in the overlay |
8 |
> > not counting the ebuilds that got into portage and were removed again |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > - we have 8 developers, 4 trusted committers who have taken the ebuild quiz |
11 |
> > and 26 users committing to the overlay |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > The basic project concept of creating a social workspace has been reached. |
14 |
> > #gentoo-sunrise is an active IRC channel where users usually find help |
15 |
> > quickly and it also forms a friendly community. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20060720-summary.txt |
18 |
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20060720.txt |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Errrr....so since when did we have the discussion where you actually |
21 |
> addressed all of the numerous concerns brought forth right before this |
22 |
> project was initially suspended? Looking at the meeting log, the |
23 |
> council even noted that the concerns had not been addressed, yet still |
24 |
> voted to un-suspend anyway. WTF? |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
I don't seem to remember this. I do though seem to remember that I |
28 |
noted that there was complaints, but died away after Mike asked to |
29 |
actually give some concrete feedback. |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Martin Schlemmer |