1 |
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Anthony G. Basile <blueness@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> And now for something completely different ... drum roll ... Really! We |
3 |
> have to have a council vote on whether bc goes into stage3? If this does go |
4 |
> to the council, then I want a pre-vote vote: should we bounce the decision |
5 |
> back to the releng team? We should not micro manage to this level. |
6 |
> |
7 |
|
8 |
I never said we have to have a council vote. However, any dev can ask |
9 |
for the Council to take up any agenda item. The Council can always |
10 |
choose to defer to another team. As of this moment, nobody has asked |
11 |
to put it on the agenda. However, putting it on the agenda is better |
12 |
than having a huge flamewar with no resolution. |
13 |
|
14 |
I don't think the Council needs to vote on individual packages being |
15 |
in/out of @system and so on, but it does make sense for the Council to |
16 |
decide the guidelines for what does go in. |
17 |
|
18 |
There is a big debate here about whether @system should be a |
19 |
collection of useful stuff, or a minimal set of core dependencies, |
20 |
etc. That seems like a topic worth discussing to me... |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Rich |