Archives
Archives
| From: | Benda Xu <heroxbd@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Functional portage with namespace | ||
| Date: | Sun, 11 Mar 2018 22:58:10 | ||
| Message-Id: | 87sh96rzm5.fsf@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Functional portage with namespace (Was: Integrating Portage with other package managers) by X dej |
||
| 1 | Hi Xdej, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | X dej <dreplaceelettereejbyeletterea@×××××.com> writes: |
| 4 | |
| 5 | > If you want to have reproducible binaries, you may also want to alter |
| 6 | > the clock of the sandbox system. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Ha, indeed many packages hardwrites "date of build" alike. That is a |
| 9 | hard question to define reproducibility. I would rather ignore the |
| 10 | timestamps when comparing two binaries. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Benda |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Functional portage with namespace | Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> |