Archives
Archives
| From: | Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:51:50 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1402761029.16949.1.camel@rook | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 2014-06-14 at 16:13 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 | > On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:41:51 +0200 |
| 3 | > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 | > > However, this means that we force much more rebuilds than necessary. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > This shouldn't be considered to be a problem. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | This would be suicide for Gentoo as a distro. Organizations that have a |
| 9 | dedicated build server and a standardized /etc/portage config tree |
| 10 | pushed to all user machines could rebuild half of @world once a week. |
| 11 | Individual users running Gentoo on a single workstation or server can't |
| 12 | and won't. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? | Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> |