1 |
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 18:55 -0500, Mark Loeser wrote: |
2 |
> With that being said, is there any reason that the package should be |
3 |
> removed so quickly? |
4 |
|
5 |
Not really, but in my experience packages up for removal are quite |
6 |
obviously so. Meaning that usually there's little question that it |
7 |
should go. |
8 |
|
9 |
In this case for example, there has been no upstream activity for a long |
10 |
time now (a year at least), the project got forked before that and now |
11 |
really has a second life as inkscape. I was even thinking about adding a |
12 |
move statement for it when removing. |
13 |
|
14 |
On the other hand, I don't mind waiting 30 days either. It's just that |
15 |
most removals right now give a 1-2 week period react time, I just kept |
16 |
to that. |
17 |
|
18 |
- foser |