| 1 |
Lina Pezzella wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> This thread brings up a very good point. There are little children using |
| 4 |
> our distribution, and they should not be exposed to dirty words such as |
| 5 |
> the one being disputed in this thread. There are other packages that are |
| 6 |
> also questionable too. "BitchX" comes to mind, and "Evolution" is on the |
| 7 |
> top of my die-package-die list. We certainly wouldn't want little |
| 8 |
> children asking about that, now would we? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Physical age != Mental age. If there's a kid out there young in physical age, |
| 11 |
and they're able to figure out Linux enough to install gentoo, then I would |
| 12 |
imagine their mental age is of a sufficient level to not be offended by the |
| 13 |
package name. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
--Kumba |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small |
| 20 |
hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." |
| 21 |
--Elrond |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives