Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Lina Pezzella <j4rg0n@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is anyone a prude?
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:12:03
Message-Id: cc582f6dcd5638b526e9171e5d534708@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is anyone a prude? by Grant Goodyear
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 This thread brings up a very good point. There are little children
5 using our distribution, and they should not be exposed to dirty words
6 such as the one being disputed in this thread. There are other packages
7 that are also questionable too. "BitchX" comes to mind, and "Evolution"
8 is on the top of my die-package-die list. We certainly wouldn't want
9 little children asking about that, now would we?
10
11 In light of the above, I suggest that in the interest of being sure not
12 to offend anyone, we remove the three aforementioned packages and any
13 others that might be offensive. It's not censorship, it's decency.
14
15 Lina Pezzella
16 Ebuild/Porting Co-Lead
17 Gentoo for Mac OS X
18 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
19 Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
20
21 iD8DBQFCIlO+NJ9STR9DbYERAnGEAJ9UWVhMZts3KBmDe92IPvhEnv9zJACfds4y
22 5xZic+UOXcdVDJBgUx2IbEs=
23 =o0qW
24 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
25
26 --
27 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Is anyone a prude? Jason S <kutsuya1@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Is anyone a prude? Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Is anyone a prude? Kumba <kumba@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Is anyone a prude? Jane Lee <jane_lee@×××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Is anyone a prude? "D. Wokan" <wokan@×××.net>