| 1 |
On Sun, 2002-08-11 at 23:44, Daniel Mettler wrote: |
| 2 |
> thus, the important thing here is that the pages are valid |
| 3 |
> {x}html pages. obviously they aren't :\ (pipe some gentoo doc |
| 4 |
> web pages through http://validator.w3.org/ and see for |
| 5 |
> yourself). astonishing. the pages are all transformed from valid |
| 6 |
> xml, aren't they? somebody from gentoo-doc should take a look at |
| 7 |
> this. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> regards |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> dan |
| 12 |
Hi Dan, |
| 13 |
They have to be built from valid xml or they won't build, I assume you |
| 14 |
mean xsl, (regardless, it's the end html that being validated/looked at |
| 15 |
here). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I've got the non-validating issue on my to-do list.. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
General Comments to everyont :- |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
<rant level="mini" severity="mild">I offer up this, would you prefer a |
| 22 |
page that validated 100% or one that actually worked in most browsers.. |
| 23 |
at the moment I don't believe that this is possible, mozilla/gecko is |
| 24 |
getting there but many other browsers don't. html has had this issue for |
| 25 |
some time.</rant> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
My thanks go to the people who have taken the time to create the list of |
| 28 |
pages that do and don't work,.. chances are they use the same parent |
| 29 |
xslt. Which will enhance the likelyhood of this getting fixed. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Colin Morey, |
| 32 |
aka, Peitolm@g.o |
Archives