| 1 |
Aaron Kulbe wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 8/22/06, *Caleb Tennis* <caleb@g.o <mailto:caleb@g.o>> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Hi all, |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Right now both the KDE and Ruby herds (which, informally, I am the |
| 8 |
> *lead* |
| 9 |
> on both) are hurting for people. I don't have the time to work on |
| 10 |
> general |
| 11 |
> maintenance and bugs at the moment, so we need some help. I've sent |
| 12 |
> out a |
| 13 |
> request for help in the GWN a few weeks ago and got a lot of good |
| 14 |
> leads on |
| 15 |
> potential new devs, but unfortunately I don't have the time right now to |
| 16 |
> mentor anyone either. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> If you're able to help in either one of these herds, it would |
| 19 |
> certainly be |
| 20 |
> appreciated. You don't need my permission or anything - just add |
| 21 |
> yourself |
| 22 |
> to the herd and throw a mail out to the alias saying you're joining us. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Caleb, |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> question... gem is the "official" package manager for Ruby. Why do we |
| 29 |
> put Ruby stuff, other than the bare minimums to get Ruby running, in the |
| 30 |
> portage tree? Why not just let gem handle it? |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
I favor this the same way I favor pear and pecl to handle those |
| 34 |
extensions. But to each his own I guess... Aaron and I will have our own. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> |
| 39 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/ |
Archives