| 1 |
On 8/22/06, Caleb Tennis <caleb@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Hi all, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Right now both the KDE and Ruby herds (which, informally, I am the *lead* |
| 6 |
> on both) are hurting for people. I don't have the time to work on general |
| 7 |
> maintenance and bugs at the moment, so we need some help. I've sent out a |
| 8 |
> request for help in the GWN a few weeks ago and got a lot of good leads on |
| 9 |
> potential new devs, but unfortunately I don't have the time right now to |
| 10 |
> mentor anyone either. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> If you're able to help in either one of these herds, it would certainly be |
| 13 |
> appreciated. You don't need my permission or anything - just add yourself |
| 14 |
> to the herd and throw a mail out to the alias saying you're joining us. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
Caleb, |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I'm going to add myself to the Ruby herd, if I can ever get infra- to get |
| 20 |
off their asses and put my keys back up on the servers. I had a total data |
| 21 |
loss in the last couple weeks, and had to rebuild. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
question... gem is the "official" package manager for Ruby. Why do we put |
| 24 |
Ruby stuff, other than the bare minimums to get Ruby running, in the portage |
| 25 |
tree? Why not just let gem handle it? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Cheers, |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Aaron Kulbe |
| 30 |
superlag@g.o |
Archives